What Should We Know About Fortunato - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 659 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2019/05/23 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: The Cask of Amontillado Essay Did you like this example? The Cask of Amontillado is one of Poes most famous short stories. In the story a man named Montresor takes revenge upon his friend, Fortunato. Readers dont know what Fortunato did to deserve revenge. During the 1700s in a European city Montresor had a plan to get revenge on Fortunato. The both of them meet during a festival called carnival season, Montresor then convinces Fortunato to go home with him to an underground wine vault to taste a special type of sherry wine called Amontillado. Although Amontillado might not be real Montresor lets Fortunato know that, but Montresor also pretends to ask another man named Luchesi to taste it just so he can trick Fortunato into wanting to be the one to taste it. Montresor then goes down to his wine vault, and acts on his plan of revenge. Fortunato was in luck, he received a pipe of what passes for Amontillado. Fortunato had his doubts about it though, so Luchesi decides to be on his way because if anyone will know a real Amontillado it would be him. Fortunato was led through multiple suites of rooms that brought him into the vaults. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "What Should We Know About Fortunato" essay for you Create order Going along the vaults, The Montresors were a great and numerous family as you can see all around. Passing through walls of piled bones, and puncheons into the inmost recesses of the catacombs. Luchesi grabbed Fortunato ad shouted the The nitre! The nitre increases, it hangs like a moss upon the vaults. Being below the rivers bed drops of moisture trickle among the bones. It is nothing Luchesi said to Fortunato, I need another drink of wine. Fortunato gave a bottle of De Grave to Luchesi, Luchesi finished it up in a quick breath, his eyes flashed with a fierce light. He laughed and threw the bottle upwards with a gesture, Fortunato didnt understand but Luchesi looked at him in surprise and said its the movement, a ridiculous one. Passing through a range of low arches, arrived at a deep crypt in which foulness of the air caused torches to glow than to turn into flame. At the end of the crypt was walls lined up with human remains piled to the vault ahead. Going along the vault was Amontillado. In an instant reaching the wall and finding progress stopped by a rock they stood completely confused. Montresor then chained up Fortunato to the granite. In its surface were two iron rings, distant from each other about two feet, horizontally. Throwing the links around his waist it took only a few seconds to lock it. Fortunato was too surprised to fight back. Montresor then barely laid the first layer when discovering that Fortunatos intoxication had worn off. A low moaning cry from inside the hole was heard, it was not the cry of a drunken man. A succession of loud and shrill screams bursting all of a sudden from the throat of the chained form seemed to throw Fortunato violently back. A quiet laugh that followed along a sad voice Fortunato was in pain. A voice laughing along saying what a good joke, an excellent joke indeed. Following along saying we will have a rich laugh about it at the palazzo continuously laughing. The Amontillado! Montresor shouted. Let us be gone is all that is saying, yes let us be gone for the love of God, Montresor. Montresor listened in vain for a reply, he grew impatient. Yelling on the other hand screaming out Fortunato Fortunato, no answer. Thrusting a torch through the remaining hole came fo rth in return of jingling bells. His heart grew sick of the dampness of catcombs, he hurried to make an end of his work but forced the last stone into its position and plastered it up against the new masonry. He also re-erected the old pile of bones, and for the half of a century no human has disturbed them. May he rest in peace Montresor said talking about Fortunato.

Examples Of Redemption In The Kite Runner - 1227 Words

Kite Runner is a novel written by author Khaled Hosseini. The setting takes place in multiple cities and countries such as California, America specifically Fremont, but the main story is in Kabul, Afghanistan in 1975 through 2001. The story is about the protagonist and the narrator of the story Amir. Amir is a wealthy Pashtun boy who grows up in Kabul along with his father Baba. When Amir is nearly 12 years old along with his friend Hassan they spend their days trying to win the prizes in the tournament by kite-fighting in the hitherto peaceful city of Kabul. After several kites-fighting competition, the tournament is held in Amir’s neighborhood. Amir simply participate and wins that tournament, but he loses his kite, Hassan tells him he†¦show more content†¦The boys tells him to hands over the kite, but Hassan refuses. Hassan is beating up with no help from his best friend Amir, Amir is totally only watchs, â€Å"I realized I still hadn’t breathed out. I exha led, slowly, quietly, i felt paralyzed. I watched them close in on the boy i’d grown up with, the boy whose harelipped face had been my first memory† (Hosseini 71). Hassan has always stands up for Amir, but Amir do not return the favor when Hassan needs him. Amir remember that he and Hassan are more than a friends they were fed from the same breast. Later on Hassan comes to Amir and he is bleeding he gives Amir the kite without saying a word, Amir either does not say anything â€Å"I opened my mouth, almost said something. Almost. The rest of my life might have turned out differently if I had. But I didn’t. I just watched† (Hosseini 79). From day to another Amir realizes his guilt for not standing for his loyal friend. Ù Assef do not feels sorry for what he’s done and he says Hassan deserve it because he is a Hazara. When Amir arrives to Afghanistan he tries to get Hassan’s son â€Å"Sohrab†, he sees Assef has control of the boy. Am ir tries to pay Assef for the boy, Assef refuses and pluck a red grape . Put it, lovingly, in Sohrab s mouth and says So if I need money, i ll have them wire it to me (Hosseini 282). Assef is now with Taliban and he tells Amir about his game â€Å"Every night the commandant, wouldShow MoreRelatedAn Outline of The Kite Runner1602 Words   |  6 PagesKite Runner Outline Thesis: Betrayal leads to feeling of guilt which forces the person in search of redemption either directly or through indirect actions and gestures. What truly constitutes forgiveness? Forgiveness has a different context depending on where the person is from or what he believes. Religion places a great emphasis on the view of forgiveness. Love is the major reason why people want to forgive and thus move on to normalize their relationships. In the Kite Runner, RahimRead MoreRedemption in The Kite Runner1038 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"For you, a thousand times over.† In The Kite Runner by Kahled Hosseini, there is a recurring theme of redemption that is portrayed by various literary devices. Kahled excellently juxtaposes devices such as irony, symbolism, and foreshadowing to show redemption within his first novel. As a foreword, the story of The Kite Runner focuses on a man named Amir. In his childhood, he enjoyed a high-class life in Kabul, Afghanistan, living with his father Baba. They have two servants, Ali and his son HassanRead MoreFree Will And Redemption In The Kite Runner And Oedipus Rex1126 Words   |  5 Pages The themes of The Kite Runner and Oedipus Rex are free will and redemption. The author of each book shows how redemption is a major aspect in both stories by leading up to what each character did of their free will and showing the significance of how vile their mistakes were. Although the two authors thought the way to redemption was pain, the pain was very different in each book. In Oedipus rex, Oedipus took responsibility immediately and thought his redemption could only be fulfilled by exileRead MoreA Trip to Redemption in Khaled Hosseinis The Kite Runner Essay703 Words   |  3 PagesAuthor: Khaled Hosseini published The Kite Runner in 2003. By 2005 it became the number one New York Times Bestseller. Although this book was his first novel, people still couldn’t get enough of his story about the troubled friendship between two boys. Sylvester Stallone, an American actor, once said, â€Å"Most action is based on redemption and revenge, and thats a formula. Moby Dick was f ormula. It is how you get to the conclusion that makes it interesting†. From time to time mistakes are made everyRead More Khaled Hosseinis The Kite Runner Essay1008 Words   |  5 PagesKhaled Hosseinis The Kite Runner In the Kite Runner, the author explores the ties that bind sons to fathers and childhood friends to one another and of the forces that tear them apartRead MoreThe Kite Runner and Novel1201 Words   |  5 Pagesthe concept of circularity in the novel. What important cycles exist in the characters lives and histories? How is circularity connected to redemption? Explore the way in which courage is portrayed in the novel. What constitutes true bravery? What are the key moments when characters are brave and who is the bravest character, if any? Use specific examples from the text to support your argument. Each character in the novel is shaped not only by his particular circumstances, but by the historicalRead MoreJustice in The Kite Runner Essay1459 Words   |  6 PagesIn the literature, The Kite Runner, by Khaled Hosseini, the idea and representation of justice, and its relationship to that of the treatment of women in Afghan society, the ever-changing politics of Afghanistan, and the desired results of redemption and forgiveness, become illustrated through the novel’s characters and motives. Justice can be defined as the quality of being guided by truth, reason, and fairness. The Kite Runner illustrates the power of influence from an outside power and its effectsRead MoreThe Kite Runner By Khaled Hosseini1050 Words   |  5 Pagesagain.† (Hosseini 334). This quote given by Rahim Khan to Amir holds a great amount of force and symbolism. In theory, this quote symbolizes the beginning of Amir’s path to redemption. The eye-opening Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini tells about the struggles of Afghanistan before and during the Taliban, and one’s struggle for redemption and acceptance. With regards to the opening quote, some see Amir’s actions as selfish. However, others may believe that Amir truly changed and grew to forgive himself andRead MoreKite Runner Essay1471 Words   |  6 PagesIn the literature, The Kite Runner, by Khaled Hosseini, the idea and representation of justice, and its relationship to that of the treatment of women in Afghan society, the ever-changing politics of Afghanistan, and the desired results of redemption and forgiveness, become illustrated through the novel’s characters and motives. Justice can be defined as the quality of being guided by truth, reason, and fairness. The Kite Runner illustrates the power of influence from an outside power and its effectsRead MoreSimilarities Between Oedipus Rex And The Kite Runner941 Words   |  4 PagesWhat similarities could current fiction novels possib ly have with old Greek drama? Greek dramas and current day novels have more in common than anyone realizes. For example, there are many similarities between Sophocles’ play Oedipus Rex and Khaled Hosseini’s The Kite Runner. These similarities show how writing and entertainment have not completely changed despite how long it has been. One of the most important similarities is the theme. This essay will explore these two works by looking into the

A Comparative Study on Social Responsibility of a Business

Question: Evaluate Cohens article on social responsibility. Consider how his perspective aligns with those of classic management experts Drucker and Friedman? Answer: A Comparative Study on Social Responsibility of a Business Introduction: The study compares the opinion of famous Author William A. Cohen and his perspective on corporate social responsibility. William A. Cohen is presently the president Institute of leader Arts, he was among Druckers first batch of executive PhD graduate. He is the author of many well known books like A class with Drucker, Drucker on Leadership and many others. His works are mostly based on Drucker and his own views. Based on their case studies and The concept of social responsibility: Social responsibility is an ethical guideline that suggests a unit irrespective of an organization or individual. Responsibility towards the society is Social responsibility. It is a duty that is expected to be performed by organizations or individuals to balance between the social systems. It sustains the equilibrium between welfare of the society and the economic development (Benn Bolton, 2011). The social responsibilities that are taken by an organization for its stakeholders and the society, is known as Corporate Social responsibility. Many people called it as Business social responsibility. A business is liable for the impact on environment by its activities. Corporate social responsibility takes care to that part of the Organization. CSR is a compulsive inclusion of public welfare. Though it is a new concept yet, has become an integral part of a company. In the article of William A. Cohen, it referred a real life incidence of two people, one was Andrew Carnegie and the other was Julius Rosenwald. They had a different perception of social responsibility from each other. Where Carnegie use to give money from his private fortune for social good, there Rosenwald considered social responsibility as a fraction of his ongoing business. Cohens thought on Social responsibility: According to Cohen, what Drucker implied was that corporation should act as a social institution and must possess some social responsibilities. Cohen termed Social responsibility as the in thing. Many organizations have their entire department that supports social responsibility, the appropriate measure of improving their actions, and developing ongoing social programs. Social responsibility to its workers: CSR can frame the perception of organizational justice towards the organizational workers. The corporate leaders are responsible for workers in and out from the organizations perspective. Social responsibility to its shareholders: the term shareholder means those who are impacted by the activities of an organization. Cohen supported Drucker that the first responsibility of an organization is that to achieve the organizational goal. Amidst the process the shareholders remain as an asset for the organization. The social responsibility of an organization towards its shareholders is earning profit in order to maintain the sustainability of the organization. Social responsibility towards the society: in society level Cohen quoted Drucker where he stated that the existence of a healthy organization cannot be in a society full of sickness. Even though the organizations are not responsible for a sick society, still it should take the social responsibility. The alignment of Cohens perspective with Drucker: According to Drucker, an organized society is an interdependent society. Both Drucker and Cohen agreed on the fact that a good leadership results in an effective social responsibility. Citing the example of Rosenwald, they explained that without a good leadership the company would never be able to achieve its social responsibility. Drucker believes that leadership had no substitute; hence it is a vital phenomenon in a business (Cohen, 2009). Drucker and cohen both accepted that public good and self-interest can be kept apart. For the common weal of a society an organization is supposed to be responsible. It is the part of every organization, who ultimately contributes for the social welfare. Comparison between Cohen and Friedmans opinion: According to Friedman, business cannot have responsibilities, even in a vague sense. The corporate executives are not bound to engage in a social responsibility, but they are bound to their owners. If the executive chooses his ethical values over that of the companys then he will be considered as spending the customers money. A private business owner cannot be manipulated. Hence the firms social responsibility decision lies upon to the owner himself. Friedman argued that social responsibility should not be exercised by the employees who are responsible for making decisions for an organization (Mulligan, 1986). Cohen had a different opinion referring to Julius Rosenwalds approach to business social responsibility. He found that under the leadership of Rosenwald there had been a huge progress in sales at Sears Roebuck. This did not stop Rosenwald to invest money in educational institutions. But Rosenwald firmly believed in the fact that welfare of a company is based on its customers skill, well-being and knowledge. Cohen agreed that educating and developing the skill and knowledge of the customer, of an organization, is an effective business social responsibility. Cohen supported this fact because this idea brought Sears Roebucks company as one of the largest merchant in the world. Aligning their theories about current business climate promoting green environment: Where Milton Friedman focused more on business profit, there Drucker explained the importance of the role that and organization should play for its society. Cohen explained that a business should not just focus in its profitability but also a contribution to the society. In 2009 a corporate social responsibility model was proposed by Castello and Lorenso. In their model they explained management system as a major factor in developing the change in corporate social responsibility (Gottschalk, 2011). A new trend has been introduced about green certificate for corporate. The green business takes responsibility to check the impact made by various organizations to its environment (Lyon Maxwell, n.d.). This is a support to the society that follows the concept of Peter Drucker as well as William A.Cohen. Today the world is facing various environmental issues; organizations are majorly blamed for it. It is because of the equipments used, the emission, and the pollution which are the consequences of manufacturing and other factories. In order to reduce these problems Organizations took initiative. Like in NAT steel of Singapore they firmly believe in green reservation (Natsteel.com.sg, 2015). This is because Singapore one had a huge water crisis due to pollution in Singapore river. Conclusion: The modern concept explains that managers should be guardians and instigators of a communal change towards development for sustainability. In green context corporate should show their intention for a healthy environment. Due to global warming and other environmental changes, the organizations have recently started taking care of their environment. Earlier the corporate issues were more about the labors but today the organizations had to make the green concept another vital factor. Through the arguments of various scholars, it has been found that an organization that abides social responsibility stand out to be successful in business. Recently corporate social responsibility has become more about Organizational gain than about social responsibility. It can be better understood, if a company establishes a hospital in its name, then the name turns out to be an advertising as well. The society would see that the company made a hospital, but in reality the company created a good will as well as a brand value. References Benn, S., Bolton, D. (2011).Key concepts in corporate social responsibility. Los Angeles: SAGE. Cohen, W. (2009). What Drucker taught us about social responsibility.Leader To Leader,2009(51), 29-34. doi:10.1002/ltl.315 Gottschalk, P. (2011).Corporate social responsibility, governance and corporate reputation. New Jersey: World Scientific. Lyon, T., Maxwell, J. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Environment: A Theoretical Perspective.SSRN Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1011793 Mulligan, T. (1986). A critique of Milton Friedman's essay ?the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits?.Journal Of Business Ethics,5(4), 265-269. doi:10.1007/bf00383091 Natsteel.com.sg,. (2015).NatSteel. Retrieved 19 February 2015, from https://www.natsteel.com.sg/csr

Ishmeal And Maya Angelou Essays - Lecturers, Maya Angelou, Ishmael

Ishmeal And Maya Angelou There are many different views on how people should live our lives. All of these different philosophies come from many different places. They come from religions, people's cultures, and their morals that they have been taught. People live by these rules they were brought into from the day they are born and do not question them. In A Rock, A River, A Tree, by Maya Angelou and Ishmael, by Daniel Quinn, both attempt to show how humans should live their lives and survive in a community. There way of changing the world is to convince readers to stand up and speak out about how to save the world. Daniel Quinn specificly helps readers to see that our lives are governed by matured laws that humans refuse to acknowledge-- this causing their, our destruction. In Ishmael Daniel Quinn sets the idea of having to think differently by having the book being told my a man who's teacher is a talking Gorilla. The Gorilla's name is ironicly Ishmael. Ishmael teaches captivity which he has been in his whole life and has mastered. As a Gorilla he has a totally different view on the world. He Petteys 2 states in many ways that he believes that we must stand up for saving the world. In the beginning of the book Ishmael is talking about Germany before and during World War Two. He talks about how everyone followed the story if they believed in it or not because the people around you made you captive by the story by believing in it. Behind that story is another one the makes your mind think that maybe if that one person did stand a few people would realize that it was wrong and stand up too, and maybe the WWII or the holocaust would have never happened. Later in the book they are working on why people are knowingly destroying the world and doing nothing about it. Ishmael tries to explain that they try not think too searchingly about the world they're leaving their children to cope with. He says that they are pacified about the subject. This is Quinn's way of using a scare tactic on the readers, to make us believe we are brain washed and need to rebel. Later in the book there is another story about how men kept jumping off from the edge of a cliff with a flying contraption, believing it will work all the way up until they hit the ground, think in the way that they made it this far without a scratch. On this pilot's way down he sees many other abandoned flying machines. If all the past pilots spoke up to what had happened to them, then maybe they would all be flying by the process of trial and error. Through out the whole bo Petteys 3 book Quinn is throwing in small stories that make you think what would have went differently if one person stood up for what they really thought, or did. A poem A Rock, A River, A Tree was written by Maya Angelou. In the poem she writes Come, you may stand upon my back and face your destiny, But seek no haven in my shadow, I will give you no more hiding place down here In this quote she is saying that people have to stand up in what you believe in even if it doesn't work and human kind ends up looking into future which is the end of the world. It says that humans will gain nothing by standing back and hiding from the world, but by trying there is a chance even if it is such a small chance but the more people that stand up the more the chance gets smaller. The poem goes on to talk about how humans have only been created a little lower than The angels and have played ignorant for to long. Its time that people stand up and learn how to stop the evils of the world and fix what they have already done. Angelou says take it into the palms of your hands Mold it into the shape of your most private need... of your most public self she is trying

Kurt Vonnegut essays

Kurt Vonnegut essays He [Vonnegut] had no taste for war; and even less for being a survivor of it. (Blieler 553) When a person faces the hardships of life, he must develop a way of dealing with the dark situation set before him. Kurt Vonnegut, one of Americas outstanding modern authors, certainly dealt with the atrocities of life himself. His experiences during the Great Depression, his childhood, and World War II helped mold his perspective on humanity. Vonneguts means of coping with these horrific difficulties was to see the humor in the midst of tragedy. Born in 1922, into a family who emigrated from Germany in 1848, Kurt Vonnegut was one of three children of Kurt and Edith Vonnegut who settled in Indianapolis, Indiana. The Vonnegut family prospered in a flourishing German-American society. In his early teens, however, Vonnegut dealt with the first major setback of his life. During the Great Depression, his affluent lifestyle became a meager one. His family was forced to move to a smaller, less flamboyant house built by his father, a successful architect (Litz 754). Th e new economic circumstances formed by this Depression traumatized his parents. His father later gave up on life, and after Kurt Jr.s enlistment, his mother committed suicide in 1944 by taking an overdose of sleeping pills. In a later interview Vonnegut confessed: I learned a bone-deep sadness from them [his parents] (Allen 2-3). In addition to the influences of his adolescence, Vonnegut faced the brutality of war. In 1944, Vonnegut was serving infantry duty in Europe, when he was caught behind German lines at the Battle of the Bulge and sent to Dresden, Germany, as a prisoner. In February, 1945, the Allies unleashed a firestorm that essentially annihilated the historic city of Dresden, killing nearly 135,000 thousand people. Luckily Vonnegut was working in an underground meat locker, somehow emerging to the blasted landscape one of ...

Captain Corellis Mandolin Essays

Captain Corellis Mandolin Essays Captain Corellis Mandolin Paper Captain Corellis Mandolin Paper Essay Topic: Literature The novel Captain Corellis Mandolin, written by Louis De Bernieres in 1994, explores humanity; we sigh at their suffering as they are ripped apart and forever changed by war. 1 The quotation in the title is spoken by Carlo quite early on in the novel, at the end of chapter 15, titled LOmosessuale (4). He is referring to the idea that war is repeatedly shown to be patriotic, heroic, and indeed wonderful especially in film and literature. However, from Carlos experiences in Albania, he knows the true reality of war, as he has seen and experienced the suffering. We can trace Carlos progression of thought through his personal chapters; all entitled LOmosessuale. He begins saying, How wonderful it was to be at this war(p. 119) We hear him describe crossing the foreign border as exhilarating, and he and his comrades view themselves as the new legionaries of the new empire that would last ten thousand years. (p. 119) This was his view at the very beginning of war, before he had really experienced any suffering. As he is yet to encounter any conflict, it is likely he has been influenced by the propaganda at the time, organised by the Italian leader, Mussolini. The next quotation is said slightly further on during Carlos experience, How wonderful it was to be at war, until the weather turned against us. (p. 120) It is here that we begin to hear of some of the suffering that Carlo and his comrades had to endure, such as we were ten thousand men soaked to the bone(p. 120). The real tragedy of war is death, and Carlo has had direct experience of this. He says, War is wonderful until someone is killed(p. 122). This is when De Bernieres chooses to use graphic images to show the suffering that Carlo and his comrades endure. I realised that I was covered with gory scraps of human flesh that were freezing fast to my uniform(p. 122). Finally, Carlo says the quotation in the title, War is a wonderful thing, in movies and in books on page 124. It is here that Carlo has realised the actuality of war, and can see that this idealised version is fictitious and can only be seen in movie and in books. War scorches a trail through all of their lives. What seems, at the beginning of the novel, like a game, a challenge to manhood, a matter of honour, an occasion for political satire, becomes an appalling reality. Carlo asserts that war is shown to be wonderful in movies and in books. However, De Bernieres does not follow this trend, and shows the war for what it is. De Bernieres characters starve and die slowly with their entrails hanging out; he depicts the horror that they have to endure to fight for their country, and the suffering that they are put through. In Albania, Carlo says It was as though a portion of my mind has disappeared, or as though my soul had diminished to a tiny point of grey light(p. 138). De Bernieres also shows the gore and bloodshed caused by the war, when he describes the death of Francesco. In chapter 19, LOmosessuale (6), De Bernieres uses Carlos narrative to tell the reader the true details of Francescos death, and then the sanitised version for his mother. As well as this showing Carlos considerate nature, it also confirms that many people did view the war in a very different light from its reality, including Francescos mother. He died on a fine day, Signora, with the sun shining and the birds singing. (He died on a day when the snow was melting and when, beneath that carapace, there were emerging a thousand corpses, knapsacks, rusted riffles, water bottles, illegible unfinished letters drenched in blood) (p. 148). Corelli wrote the novel, after falling in love with the Island of Cephallonia, and wanting to inform readers about what happened to this Island during World War II. For this reason, he has depicted a very real and veritable account of atrocities that occurred during the Second World War. Everyone is shot, without regard for rank or role, even the medics and the chaplains. However, in the film adaptation of Captain Corellis Mandolin, directed by John Madden, war is viewed in a very different light. De Bernieres has said of the film The problem is that film-makers take out all your good ideas and replace them with a load of stupid ones. 4 The depiction of war in the film is very different and many scenes seem to have been watered down5, in order to appeal to far wider audience. The movie has been widely criticised, after changing the story line drastically from a tragic story of the destruction and consequences of war, to a love story between Corelli and Pelagia. 6 Although much of De Bernieres novel depicts the horror of war, some of the consequences of war are indeed wonderful. Corelli and Pelagia would have never found love without the intervention of war in their lives, and although ultimately war destroys their love, the moments spent together made the war endurable. The prefatory poem at the beginning on the novel shows Louis De Bernieres hinting, even before the novel has begun, that war will be an important theme throughout. The Soldier by Humbert Wolfe describes the waste of war, and the loss of lives and of youth. Links are evident between this poem and Captain Corellis mandolin as they both explore the way in which war has an effect on different people. The presence of war on the Island of Cephallonia has various effects on different characters and can expose peoples flaws and merits. An excellent example of this is the contrast shown between Mandras and Antonio Corelli. Corelli has been drawn into a war that he really has no heart for. You mean youre a soldier by mistake? (p. 206, Pelagia). He has no desires to be a soldier and his character is often seen as anti-military. When giving punishments he does not follow the rules that are expected of him, To everyones surprise the captain pointed his pistol straight into the face of one of the culprits(p. 324). However, although he had no intention of doing so, Corelli proves to be an excellent comrade and shows morality throughout the war. This is my morality, I make myself imagine that it is personal(p. 351). This is greatly contrasted with the character of Mandras. He has very high expectations about the life of a soldier and feels he has to prove himself to Pelagia and the rest of the Island. He resents those who know more than him, yet does not want to prove himself intellectually, as he believes no man is a man until he has been a soldier(p. 80) Carlos assertion that war is wonderful in movies and in books reflects a idealised view of the war. However, Mandras believes that this view was the reality of war and he felt that becoming a soldier would make him more worthy as a man. Ill come back and everyone will say, Thats Mandras, who fought in the war. We owe everything to people like him. He is indoctrinated by what is expected of him, and is predicted to conform. However high Mandras expectations were, the war does not elevate him, it brings him down. During his experiences in war he saw others abuse their power, and now feels he has a right to do the same, The war de-humanises him, and instead of changing him for the better it changes him for the worse. The war in Cephallonia showed the best and the worst in people. In Antonio Corellis case it displays his merits as he has the opportunity to exercise his humanity in the treatment of others. From the beginning of the novel, Corelli is represented as a laid-back, light-hearted leader. Although he has a great talent as a leader, he is very modest and introduces Carlo as one of our heroes, He has a hundred medals for saving life and none for taking it(p. 202). He proves himself as an excellent comrade and Captain by being faithful to his men until the very end. There is no honour in this war, but I have to be with my boys(p. 392). His introduction of La Scala also shows good comradeship, as it is a humorous and practical solution to having to use communal toilets. This is also a crucial element of the novel, as before they go to join the shooting line up, they sing to maintain their composure. He also shows his forgiving nature when he chooses to forgive Gunter for what he has done. I forgive you. If I do not, who will? (p. 397). He says of himself I am not a natural parasite(p. 305) and this is seen clearly when he avoids any confrontation with Pelagia. He is uncomfortable about living with Pelagia and her father Tonight I shall sleep in the yard and tomorrow I shall request alternative accommodation(p. 204). Corellis fondness for animals is De Bernieres way of showing positive traits in a character. The fact that Corelli is so attached to Psipsina shows that he is an admirable man and the reader feel connected to him. The captain had some engaging traits. He tied a cork to a piece of string, and sprinted about the house with Psipsina in hot pursuit and if the animal happened to be sitting on a piece of music, he would go away and fetch another sheet rather than disturb her(p. 250) Corelli also shows fondness for children in his relationship with Lemoni. Although there is a language barrier, the two are able to communicate on a different level, and are able to enjoy each others company. The child was whooping and laughing, and it appeared that what was transpiring was a lesson in Italian. Bella fanciulla, the captain was saying. He was waiting for Lemoni to repeat it. Bla fanshla, she giggled. (p. 211) He also appears to have a very different attitude than other soldiers, when he arrives in Cephallonia with his mandolin strapped to his back, and not a gun, as you would expect from a soldier. The mandolin that was called Antonia because it was the other half of himself. This love for music is another engaging trait that the captain has, and is one of the reasons Pelagia falls in love with him. We also see this originality to his character when Gunter Weber, a german soldier, introduces himself. Weber says Heil Hitler, yet Corelli says Heil Puccini, showing he has a very different attitude to the war, and will not be led by anyone. This again shows his love for classical music, as Puccini was a great composer, whom Corelli was an admirer of. His relationship with Pelagia is clearly one of great love and admiration, however it also contains sexual desires, which are never consummated. Such slender fingers, such pink nails. He imagined them engaged upon amorous and nocturnal things, and realised that he was disturbing Psipsina. (p. 259, Corelli) This shows ongoing respect for Pelagia and her father, and also shows Corellis caring and considerate temperament. In contrast to Corelli, the character Mandras is brutalised by war. He believes that war will change him for the better, yet it changes him for the worse. He becomes a victim of propaganda and a victim of his insecurities. Before he leaves for war he tells Pelagia Im a Greek not a Fascist(p. 14) War changes him for the worse as he is very easily led and allows others to influence him. This may have had a positive effect on Mandras if he had chosen Iannis to guide him, yet he chooses Hector, the leader of a branch of the ELAS. Joining this group causes him to abandon his personal values, and this is seen when he whips the old man. Mandras did not even notice that the man had stopped moving, had stopped screaming and whining(p. 233). He manages to blank out the emotions that he should be feeling, and begins to enjoy the power he holds over this old man. If you didnt think about what it was, it sounded weirdly beautiful(p. 234) After returning from the war, he becomes much more manipulative, especially towards Pelagia and Drosoula. Mandras had begun his exile into inaccessibility by dramatising the idea of death(p. 180). Pelagia was convinced that he was doing it on purpose as an act of vengeance or punishment. (p. 180). This shows a very cruel side to Mandras that we have never seen before, and it clearly takes the war to bring out this negative side of his character. He has clearly been indoctrinated by the propaganda of the war, and this is seen in chapter 63, when he recites communist slogans. The party is never wrong. Whoever is not with us is against us(p. 447) He does not seem to be questioning what he has been told, he just repeats it. He has experienced others abusing their power during his time with the ELAS and now sees this as an approved way of behaving. De Bernii res explores power and its abuse7 He insults and belittles Pelagia after he returns from fighting and tortures her further, even though he should see that she has suffered enough during the war. De Bernieres shows a side to Mandras that readers have never seen before. He represents him as evil and sadistic, and we see Mandras refer to Pelagia as a slut. His morals have disintegrated following his fighting with the ELAS, and feels that he can do whatever he wants. This is due to the fact that the ELAS would make up their own rules for their comrades to follow. The war de-humanises Mandras and he represents the damage that can be inflicted by extreme politics. In Mandras death, De Bernieres wants readers to feel pity for him, as it is clear the communist party has seriously indoctrinated him. He dies as a victim of the war, and a desire to prove himself worthy, and this also evokes compassion in the reader Carlo is a character in the novel who shows how war can bring out the best in people. He is a very honourable character, and has to live with the secret that he is homosexual. He puts aside his desire for Corelli in order to help the romance between Pelagia and Corelli develop. I have loved you with the same surprise and gratitude that I see in your own eyes when you are with Pelagia(p. 384). He shows true bravery in front of the firing squad when stepping in front of Corelli to save his life. Antonio Corelli had found in front of him the titanic bulk of Carlo Guercio(p. 399). De Bernieres uses Carlos narrative in the chapters entitled LOmosessuale, and this allows the readers to sympathise further with the silent suffering that Carlo has to endure during the war. His writings are eloquently written and his language is poetic and beautiful, showing the gentle side to his character. He died on a fine day, Signora, with the sun shining and the birds singing. (P. 148, Carlo) Father Arsenios was saved by the war(p. 292). De Bernieres absolves Arsenios after the war and liberates him from his former self. However, the characters perceive him as a mad man and cannot see that war has brought about his finest hour. He is referred to as the crazy priest yet he feels he is a saviour and it is probable that, had he lived, Arsenios might have become a saint(p. 295). De Bernieres chooses to depict war in a graphic and realistic light in his novel, Captain Corellis Mandolin. Although in many films or books war is shown to be wonderful, this idealised version is proved wrong in De Bernieres novel, as he shows the suffering that the soldiers were forced to endure. He shows that the war has different effects on different people, and it can expose their faults or their merits. Mandras is forever changed by the war, as he returns indoctrinated by the communist party. His death proves that his natural environment is the sea, where he can be accepted and does not have to prove himself. In contrast Corellis merits are shown to be more prominent as the war develops, and also as his love for Pelagia develops. The reader is drawn to the character of Corelli, even though he is an occupying soldier, as he shows compassion, kindness and respect during his time in Cephallonia.

Nasir's Rise to Power in Egypt Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Nasir's Rise to Power in Egypt - Assignment Example Though he did not become President until 1954, he openly supported a way of life for Egypt that included no presence of Western countries whatsoever, with successful results (Rose & Boxberger, 2000). This, and many other things, was to work towards his benefit during his years as President. Nasir was able to rise to such a position for several reasons. First and foremost was the feeling throughout the country that the British had stayed quite long enough (Rose & Boxberger, 2000). Nasir, who longed for a country and region with no Western influence, was the logical choice for president. Second, Nasir had great dreams and visions for the country, and felt that it had been kept not only under the thumb of Western influence but also as a second-rate country for far too long (Trueman, 2000). This gave him a starting point, a place from which Egypt could work its way from. He felt that the poverty of Egypt, as well as the lack of national pride, could be mended if the right steps were taken, such as nationalizing the Suez Canal, a move which brought him head-to-head with the former British controllers of his country and ultimately showed that Egypt was ready to stand on its own (Trueman, 2000). By the time this was realized, Nasir had not only won a monetary victory for his country, but a social one as well. He also knew the disregard for the framework of the country, its internal workings, and how little attention under the rule of the British had been paid to them (Trueman, 2000). By focusing his energies on his country, instead of far-off conquest, Nasir was able to bring not only national pride but unity to Egypt. Nasir was beloved by Egypt for many reasons. He was able to show the people of the country that he was willing to take on anything in their favor, and make sure that not only the former rulers of Egypt but the world knew that Egypt would be nothing but